The suppliers you cannot see decide your numbers.
Supply chain and sustainability mandates for European industrials. We have released €10m of EBIT, brought 98% of a chemical company’s supply chain emissions into view, and made a Scope 3 inventory audit-ready, each against a date that would not move.












What supply chain mandates taught us
THE WORKAROUND BECAME THE PROCESS
- The fix has been obvious for years. Nobody has three weeks.
- Budgets replace systems. The constraint is local practice.
SCOPE 3 IS A SUPPLIER ENGAGEMENT PROBLEM WEARING A DATA COSTUME
- The constraint is not the carbon model. It is supplier data.
- One programme hit 85% supplier engagement before accounting.
FIX DEFECTS WHERE THEY ENTER, NOT WHERE THEY ARE CAUGHT
- 62% of defect value entered at sales order creation.
- Teams optimise where the pain is felt. Money starts upstream.
Where the weeks actually go
Bar widths are to scale. Every mandate in this function runs the same eight to ten weeks.
Scope
Agree the question, the boundary and what has to be true at the end.
Question signed offField
Interviews, site walkthroughs and supplier outreach. Half the sprint is spent outside the room, not in it.
30+ interviews on a typical mandateHand over
The model, the documentation and the people trained to run it after we leave.
Model handed over, yours to runTwo hours of your team’s time a week. No workshop marathon.
Questions we have answered
Why is the workaround now the process, at every site?
Where did our Scope 3 number come from, and can we source it?
Which suppliers drive the footprint, and will they answer us?
Why do we carry this much inventory and still miss service levels?
Where do defects enter, as opposed to where we catch them?
What would consolidating these sites be worth, and what would it cost?
Which of the three is happening to you?
Pick the one that sounds like your building. It shows what that mandate returned, and where to read it.
Supplier quality and claim processes harmonised across 10 mills at a €10B pulp and paper company, six months ahead of a customer audit. 30+ stakeholders interviewed.
Standardizing Supplier Quality Workflows Across Sites →What mandates add up to
Where supply chain work actually stalls
A three part argument built from three separate supply chain mandates. Part one is a decision rule nobody had written down, part two is an owner nobody had named, part three is a system nobody trusted. Every figure is traced to a published case, and each piece says plainly what it could not settle.
Quick reads
Operational improvement work we have published. Time and activity, safety standards, maintenance and improvement culture.
Case studyUnlocking Efficiency in Plant Supervisor Operations
Read it →
Case studyStandardizing Fleet Maintenance and Control Operations
Read it →
Case studyReducing Out-of-Box Failures in Delivery Operations
Read it →
Case studyStandardizing Maintenance for Factory Reliability
Read it →
Case studyStandardising Continuous Improvement Across Sites
Read it →
Case studyUnifying Risk Assessment and Safety Processes
Read it →
Case studyBuilding a Unified Supply Chain Process Framework
Read it →
Case studyOptimizing Warehouse Replenishment Efficiency
Read it →
Case studyOptimizing Value in Integrated Sawmill Setup
Read it →Quick reads
Supply chain and sustainability work we have published. Process, inventory, supplier data and Scope 3.
Case studyOptimizing Value in Integrated Sawmill Setup
Read it →
Case studyOptimizing Inventory Planning for Coffee Trade
Read it →
Case studyStandardizing Maintenance for Factory Reliability
Read it →
Case studyOptimizing Warehouse Replenishment Efficiency
Read it →
Case studyStandardizing Supplier Quality Workflows Across Sites
Read it →
Case studyDriving Value via Supplier Sustainability Transparency
Read it →
Case studyClosing Gaps to Strengthen Sustainability Scores
Read it →
Case studyBuilding a Unified Supply Chain Process Framework
Read it →
Case studyDesigning Scope 3 Emissions Methodology
Read it →Proof
What supply chain and sustainability sprints have returned
Numbers from mandates. Every one is a client’s result, not our claim.
€10m EBIT opportunity identified
Sawmill network integration at a €10B forestry group. Four synergies modelled and stress-tested against changing market conditions, including the Russian border reopening. Four weeks from kick-off.
Read the case →
€5M cost impact uncovered
Supplier quality and claim processes harmonised across 10 mills at a €10B pulp and paper company, six months ahead of a customer audit. 30+ stakeholders interviewed.
Read the case →
97% service level designed
Three Baltic warehouses consolidated into one hub for a €1B coffee and food company. 214 SKUs optimised and two analytical models handed to the client’s own team.
Read the case →
100% Scope 3 coverage, audit-ready
Scope 3 rebuilt for SBTi reporting at a €8B industrial machinery company. 70 MtCO₂e accuracy gain, documented so an auditor can follow it.
Read the case →
98% of supply chain COâ‚‚ brought into view
Supplier greenhouse gas commitments assessed at a €3B chemical company. 15% reduction potential identified and a reporting cycle twice as fast.
Read the case →
30% rating uplift potential
ESG ratings assessed across five agencies for a €8B industrial equipment supplier. Eleven improvement areas identified and three playbooks built, sequenced by effort.
Read the case →
What supply chain and sustainability clients said
“Within 4 weeks, SprintlyWorks rapidly mapped complex material flows across our sawmills and board operations and tested synergies with a quantified EBITDA impact.”
€10B global forestry group
“The structured evaluation gave us confidence that we are investing in the right platform to support our global logistics tenders.”
€3B global chemical company
“SprintlyWorks gave us clarity on where our supervisors’ time was going. What would have taken us months internally, they delivered in weeks.”
€3B global chemical company
Which of these three is happening to you?
The workaround that became the process, the Scope 3 number nobody can source, or the defect caught three steps too late. Eight to ten weeks, one senior analyst and two juniors, and the model is yours at the end.
Talk to us →


